Functions of Governing Boards in Catholic Institutions: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Strategic Planning, Regulatory Compliance, and Resource Mobilisation in Uganda
Abstract
This qualitative study examined governing board functions in Catholic institutions across Uganda through three core dimensions: strategic planning, regulatory compliance, and resource mobilisation. Using interpretive phenomenological design, the study involved 78 participants, including board members, managers, and staff across Catholic schools and health facilities in four ecclesiastical provinces. Data collection utilised semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, analysed using MAXQDA software with thematic analysis techniques grounded in integrated agency, resource dependence, and stakeholder theories. Findings revealed significant theory-practice disconnections with 68% of boards demonstrating reactive strategic planning approaches, 73% showing reactive compliance management, and 75% exhibiting over-reliance on external funding sources. The study uncovered "ceremonial governance" patterns where boards functioned as validation rather than strategic creation bodies, operating primarily through procedural compliance rather than functional effectiveness. These findings contribute empirical evidence on governance challenges in African Catholic contexts, offering practical implications for enhancing board functionality through integrated governance standards, systematic accountability frameworks, and balanced professional-mission excellence approaches. The research addresses critical gaps in governance literature by investigating board functions beyond financial metrics in mission-driven organisations, providing insights applicable to faith-based institutions globally while recognising the unique canonical-secular accountability tensions inherent in Catholic institutional governance
Downloads
References
Agaba, M., Turyasingura, J. B., & Kabagambe, J. D. (2023). Stakeholders Resource Mobilization and Sustainability of Government Funded Agricultural Projects in Uganda: A Case Study of Potato Projects in Kabale District. African Journal of Business Management, 17(4), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm2023.9454
Andersen, T. J. (2019). Strategic Resposiveness for A Sustainable Future: New Research in International Managment (1st ed., Vol. 11, Issue 1). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Asahak, S., Albrecht, S. L., De Sanctis, M., & Barnett, N. S. (2018). Boards of Directors: Assessing Their Functioning and Validation of a Multi-Dimensional Measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(DEC), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02425
Baldwin, Robert, Cave, Martin, & Lodge, M. (2011). Catholic Institutions as Ethical Organizations: Mission, Culture, and Governance. Journal of Church and State, 64(4), 712– 733. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/csab066
Benjamin, S. (2008). Occupancy Urbanism: Radicalizing Politics and Economy Beyond Policy and Programs. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(3), 719–729.
Bezemer, P. J., Pugliese, A., Nicholson, G., & Zattoni, A. (2023). Toward a Synthesis of the Board-Strategy Relationship: A Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(1), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12481
Boivie, S., Bednar, M. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Andrus, J. L. (2016). Are Boards Designed to Fail? The Implausibility of Effective Board Monitoring. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 319– 407. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1120957
Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Clark, R. C. (2005). Harvad John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business Corporate Governance Changes in the Wake Of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act. http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/http://ssrn.com/abstract=808244
Freeman, R. Edward, Robert Phillips, and R. S. (2020). Tensions in Stakeholder Theory. Business and Society, 59(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318773750
Freeman, E. R. (1986). Strategic Management. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675
Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R., & Sisodia, R. (2020). Tensions in Stakeholder Theory. Business and Society, 59(2), 213– 231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318773750
Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3), 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764099283002
García, L. C., & Ansón, S. G. (2007). Governance and performance of Spanish privatised firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 503– 519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00584.x
Gill, M. (2020). Phenomenological Approaches to Research. Qualitative Analysis: Eight Approaches, 73– 94. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341104030_Phenomenology_as_qualitative_methodology
Groenewald, T. (2004). A Phenomenological Research Illustrated. 42–55.
Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865
Gunningham, N. (2017). Compliance, Enforcement, and Regulatory Excellence Paper Prepared for the Penn Program on Regulation’s Best-in-Class Regulator Initiative. April.
Harding, T., & Whitehead, D. (2013). Analysing Data in Qualitative Research. Nursing and Midwifery Research: Methods and Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice 5, July, 141–160.
Heidegger, M. (1996). Sein und Zeit. State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.5840/studphaen2001123
Henry, A., Vincent, O., Gladies, A., & Vincent, B. (2023). Resource Mobilization Strategies, Resource Utilization and Sustainability of Community Based Organizations in Developing Countries : Emerging studies of CBOs in Arua District, Uganda. 13(1), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.56279/orseaj.v13i1.4
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Also published in Foundations of Organizational Strategy. Journal of Financial Economics, 4, 305– 360. http://ssrn.com/abstract=94043Electroniccopyavailableat:http://ssrn.com/abstract=94043http://hupress.harvard.edu/catalog/JENTHF.html
John W. Creswell, J. D. C. (2013). Qualitative Inqiury and Research Design: Choosing among the Five Approaches. In Research in Science Education (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
John W. Creswell, J. D. C. (2021). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Research. In A. M. Helen Salmon, Chalsea Neve (Ed.), Introducing English Language (Fifth). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315707181-60
Kaptein, M. (2009). The Ethics of Organizations: A Longitudinal Study of the U.S. Working Population. Journal of Businnes Ethics, 92, 601– 618. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0175-0
Khanin, D., Turel, O., Bart, C., McDowell, W. C., & Hock-Döpgen, M. (2021). The Possible Pitfalls of Boards’ Engagement in the Strategic Management Process. Review of Managerial Science, 15(4), 1071–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00386-0
Klein, L. L., & Pereira, B. A. D. (2016). The survival of interorganizational networks: A proposal based on resource dependence theory. Revista de Administracao Mackenzie, 17(4), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n4p153-175
Koomson, J. V., & Studios, L. K. (2011). Practical Handbook on Techniques for Resource Mobilization: For Community Based and Small Women’s Rights Organizations in Africa, (African Women’ Practical Handbook on Techniques for Resource Mobilization: For Community Based and Small Women’s Rights Organ. http://awdf.org
Lawrence, A. M. (2020). Assessing Challenges and Opportunities in Resource Mobilization and Fundraising for Non-Governmental Organizations in Narok Town, Kenya. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v5i6.931
Leblanc, R. (2023). Hand Book of Board Governance: A Comprehensive Guide for Public and Private, and Not-For-Profit Members (R. Leblanc (ed.); First). John Willey & Sons, Inc.
Leos, S. (2023). Turnaround Plan for St. Leo’s College, Kyegobe. January.
Logan L. Watts, P. (2022). Governance and Regulatory Compliance in Organization. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04503
McNamara, N., & Kirakowski, J. (2006). Functionality, Usability, and User Experience: Three Areas of Concern. Interactions, 13(6), 26– 28. https://doi.org/10.1145/1167948.1167972
Mensah, J. (2020). Improving Quality Management in Higher Education Institutions in Developing Countries through Strategic Planning. Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, 4(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.137.2020.41.9.25
Miller, L. M. (2013). Team Management: The Core Practice of A High Performance Organization. 4(14), 1--29. http://www.lmmiller.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Team-Management.pdf
Mintzberg H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. Harvard University, Center for International Development, 72(1), 107–114.
Montgomery Van Wart, Paul Suino, Montgomery Van Wart, P. S. M. (2023). Leadership in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003261896
NACD. (2022). The Role of the Board in Regulatory Compliance. National Association of Corporare Directors (NACD), 30–46. https://www.nacdonline.org/
Nicholas H. Woolf, C. S. (2017). Qualitative Analysis Using MAXQDA: The Five-Level QDATM Method (1st ed.). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315268569
Nicholson, G. J., & Kiel, G. C. (2004). A framework for diagnosing board effectiveness. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 442–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00386.x
Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Ahiauzu, A., Sejjaaka, S. K., & Ntayi, J. M. (2013). A Model for Effective Board Governance in Uganda’s Services Sector Firms. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 3(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/20421161311288857
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organisations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Collins. https://craft.co/harpercollins/locations
Pope, F. (2024). Dilexit Nos: On the Human and Divine Love of the Heart of Jesus Christ, Spanish. Sunday Vistor, 10–54.
Rutledge, P. B., & Hogg, J. L. C. (2020). In‐Depth Interviews. The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology, April, 1– 7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0019
Sarfo, J. O., Debrah, T. P., Gbordzoe, N. I., & Afful, W. T. (2021). Qualitative Research Designs, Sample Size and Saturation: Is Enough Always Enough ? May 2022. https://doi.org/10.13187/jare.2021.3.60
Secretariate, U. C. (2021). Catholic Directory (Vol. 67, pp. 50–160). Uganda Episcopal Conference.
Taylor, B. (2003). Board leadership: Balancing Entrepreneurship and Strategy with Accountability and Control. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 3(2), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700310474028
Van Puyvelde, S., Caers, R., Du Bois, C., & Jegers, M. (2016). Managerial Objectives and the Governance of Public and Non-Profit Organizations. Public Management Review, 18(2), 221– 237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.969760
Van Slyke, D. M. (2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157– 187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul012
Vandersmissen, L., & George, B. (2023). Strategic Planning in Public Organizations: Reviewing 35 Years of Research. International Public Management Journal, 0(0), 1– 26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2023.2271901
Withers, M. C., Hillman, A. J., & Cannella, A. A. (2012). A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 243–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311428671
Copyright (c) 2025 Charles Oyo, Denis Musinguzi, PhD, Philip Owino

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.