Using Case Scenarios to Foster Critical Thinking Skills among Graduate Students
Abstract
In a rapidly evolving professional landscape, critical thinking is paramount for success. This study investigated the transformative impact of case scenarios on enhancing critical thinking skills among graduate students at Gulu University. The purpose was to examine how these scenarios facilitated the practical application of theoretical concepts, fostering a deeper understanding of complex issues. Utilizing a qualitative research methodology, the researchers conducted interviews and focus group discussions with recent graduates, current graduate students, and lecturers, providing comprehensive insights into participants’ perceptions and experiences regarding case scenarios. Results indicated that participants viewed critical thinking as essential for both academic achievement and professional competence. Case scenarios emerged as instrumental in promoting analytical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and the synthesis of diverse perspectives. Graduates reported significant improvements in their capacity to deconstruct complex issues, critically evaluate evidence, and generate innovative solutions. The study also highlighted the importance of incorporating culturally diverse scenarios, which enriched students' understanding of various socio-economic contexts crucial for their professional development. However, it identified gaps in the systematic integration of case scenarios into the curriculum, suggesting a need for more consistent application and institutional support. In conclusion, the findings emphasized the critical role of case scenarios in cultivating the skills necessary to navigate the complexities of modern professional environments. By effectively bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, these scenarios enhanced students’ analytical and creative capabilities, preparing them to tackle multifaceted problems. Educational stakeholders were urged to prioritize the integration of diverse, contemporary case scenarios into curricula, while future research should focus on longitudinal studies assessing the long-term impact of these scenarios on students' critical thinking skills
Downloads
References
Adams, R., & Green, M. (2023). Challenges in educational case studies: The need for continuous updates. Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 115-130.
Auma, J., & Akullo, D. (2019). Enhancing clinical skills through case-based learning in medical education. Journal of Medical Education, 14(2), 55-62.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2020). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 20(2), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2019-0140
Brown, L., Smith, K., & Johnson, R. (2022). Case scenarios in graduate education: Bridging theory and practice. Journal of Higher Education Research, 17(3), 105-120.
Buchbinder, E., & Nayar, U. (2016). Gender and sexuality in social work education: A critical approach to diversity. Routledge.
Chen, P., & Wong, A. (2023). Contextual relevance in business case studies: An evaluation of current practices. Business Education Review, 9(4), 201-215.
Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970934
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Darder, A. (2017). Reinventing Paulo Freire: A pedagogy of love. Westview Press.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.
Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
Faden, R. R., & Beauchamp, T. L. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Garcia, S., & Evans, L. (2024). Realism in educational role-playing scenarios: A critical assessment. Educational Research Quarterly, 46(1), 12-29.
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). The Community of Inquiry framework: An overview. Online Learning, 17(2), 1-10.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2020). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.
Hancock, D. R., Algozzine, B., & Hatzichristou, C. (2023). Doing qualitative research in education settings (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Cornell University Press.
Herreid, C. F. (2011). Case studies in science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(2), 38-45.
Jenkins, M., & Williams, T. (2020). Fostering problem-solving skills through engineering case scenarios. Journal of Engineering Education, 19(2), 77-88.
Kauffman, D., & O'Leary, K. (2020). Business education: Enhancing critical thinking through case studies. International Journal of Business Education, 12(1), 67-80.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2020). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1456481
Martin, H., & Liu, X. (2024). Addressing social determinants of health in public health education: A case study approach. Public Health Education Review, 11(2), 98-112.
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
McLaren, P. (2015). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Pearson.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Morgan, D. L. (2023). Focus groups as qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Nguyen, T., Green, D., & Lim, C. (2023). Cultural relevance in case studies: Implications for global learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 123, 101-113.
Nguyen, T., Green, J., & Lim, K. (2023). Cultural diversity in medical education: Addressing the gap in case scenarios. International Journal of Medical Education, 18(3), 205-215.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Resnik, D. B. (2020). The ethics of research with human subjects: Protecting people, advancing science, and societal good. Springer.
Schmidt, H. G., et al. (2016). The role of case-based learning in medical education. Medical Education, 50(3), 246-257.
Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2015). Responsible conduct of research (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Sharma, R., Shukla, A., & Tiwari, R. (2021). Ensuring transferability in qualitative research: A focus on contextualization. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211021227
Smith, J., & Johnson, A. (2021). The impact of case scenarios on critical thinking in graduate education. Educational Psychology Review, 29(4), 337-354.
Smith, R., & Jones, T. (2024). Updating legal education: The relevance of contemporary case studies. Legal Education Journal, 15(1), 43-58.
Thorne, S., Kirkham, S. R., & O’Flynn-Magee, K. (2016). Thematic analysis in qualitative research. In N. M. L. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed., pp. 575-590). Sage Publications.
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2016). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 18(1), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12248
Wagner, A. (2010). The ethics of data ownership: What researchers need to know. In T. B. G. R. Leek (Ed.), Data ethics (pp. 123-134). Academic Press.
Willingham, D. T. (2017). Why don't students like school? Because the mind is not designed for thinking. Jossey-Bass.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Copyright (c) 2024 Gloria Lamaro, Joseph Kimoga, Dianah Nampiija, Frank Reichert
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
