Extending the Subjective Dynamic Decision Model: A Heuristic and Meta-Cognitive Framework for Strategic Adaptation
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel extension of the Subjective Dynamic Decision Model (SDEM) by integrating multiple context-sensitive heuristics, adaptive decision thresholds, and a meta-cognitive uncertainty parameter. Unlike classical decision models, this enhanced framework explicitly captures feedback learning, subjective uncertainty, and self-reflective judgment, enabling a more realistic simulation of strategic behaviour under radical uncertainty. Traditional decision theories often rely on assumptions of rational agents, stable preferences, and complete information. However, in real-world contexts such as crises, complex markets, or adversarial environments, such conditions are rarely met. The enhanced SDEM integrates three core extensions to reflect cognitive and strategic diversity: (1) the availability of multiple context-sensitive heuristics, (2) a dynamic adjustment of the decision threshold based on experience, and (3) a meta-cognitive uncertainty parameter that regulates decision-making based on subjective confidence. These additions allow for the formal inclusion of adaptive learning, bounded rationality, and self-reflective judgement in decision processes. The paper presents the theoretical underpinnings of the model, discusses its implications for cognitive modelling and agent-based simulations, and illustrates its functionality through practical examples. Potential applications include cybersecurity, strategic intelligence, supply chain resilience, and energy markets. The proposed framework enables realistic modelling of heterogeneous behaviour in multi-agent environments and offers new insights into dynamic adaptation under uncertainty.
Downloads
References
Berthet, V. (2021). The impact of cognitive biases on professionals' decision-making: A review of four occupational areas. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 802439. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.802439
de Finetti, B. (1974). Theory of probability (Vol. 1). Wiley.
Epstein, J. M. (2006). Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modelling. Princeton University Press.
Fleming, S. M., & Lau, H. C. (2014). How to measure metacognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 443. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443
Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.). (2002). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. MIT Press.
Kay, J., & King, M. (2020). Radical uncertainty: Decision-making for an unknowable future. The Bridge Street Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin.
Kurdoglu, R. S., Ates, N. Y., & Lerner, D. A. (2023). Decision-making under extreme uncertainty: Eristic rather than heuristic. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2022-0587
Love, P. E. D., Ika, L. A., & Pinto, J. K. (2023). Fast-and-frugal heuristics for decision-making in uncertain and complex settings in construction. Developments in the Built Environment, 14, Article 100129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100129
Moch, E. (2025). The Subjective Dynamic Decision Model (SDEM): A new approach to decision-making under radical uncertainty. East African Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 8(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajass.8.2.2948
Ramsey, F. P. (1931). The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays. Routledge.
Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. Wiley.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioural model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
Yeung, N., & Summerfield, C. (2012). Metacognition in human decision-making: Confidence and error monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1594), 1310-1321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0416
Copyright (c) 2025 Enrico Moch, PhD

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.