Future Orthopia: A Conceptual Design for a Liberal and Robust Market Order in the 21st Century

  • Enrico Moch GrandEdu Research School
Keywords: Austrian School, Spontaneous Order, Platform Economy, Institutional Resilience, Future Orthopia
Share Article:

Abstract

This paper introduces the concept of a future orthopia, a realistic vision for an economic order that preserves the radical promise of the Austrian School while acknowledging the messy realities of today’s platform-driven, highly networked markets. At its core lies the belief that spontaneous order and decentralised knowledge, as Hayek and Mises once envisioned, still hold untapped potential for economic freedom and entrepreneurial discovery. Yet the realities of platform capitalism show how quickly data monopolies and gatekeeper structures can undermine this freedom. Using a qualitative and conceptual approach, this paper brings together classical Austrian theory, complexity economics, and modern governance research. The radical reforms under Javier Milei serve as a real-world test case, a dramatic experiment in how far deregulation, fiscal austerity, and institutional rollback can push an economy toward Austrian ideals and at what social cost. The findings suggest that spontaneous order alone is not enough when network effects, algorithmic control, and market power concentrate freedom in the hands of a few. A Future orthopia, therefore, calls for an adaptive, rule-based framework that preserves openness, safeguards diversity, and limits new forms of hidden centralisation. This is not about a return to static planning but about protecting the spaces where entrepreneurial action can flourish without being fenced off by invisible gatekeepers. The paper offers a blueprint for those who believe that freedom and fairness must be defended together and that markets, if left unchecked, can be both liberating and deeply fragile. In the end, the freedom of the market remains what it has always been: the freedom of people to think, to act, and to shape their future

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519-530.

Holland, J. H. (1992). Complex adaptive systems. Daedalus, 121(1), 17-30.

Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Krall, M. (2021). The civic revolution: A guide to saving the future. Munich: FinanzBuch Verlag.

Lachmann, L. M. (1956). Capital and its structure. London: London School of Economics.

Menger, C. (1871). Principles of economics (J. Dingwall & B. F. Hoselitz, Trans.). New York: New York University Press. (Original work published 1871)

Mises, L. von. (1949). Human action: A treatise on economics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Moch, E. (2024b). The implementation of the Austrian School of Economics in Argentina: Javier Milei's concept of freedom and the role of the state. East African Journal of Business and Economics, 7(2), 328-342. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajbe.7.2.2479

Moch, E. (2025a). Failure of socialism and the benefits of the free market in the Argentine housing market. International Research Journal of Advanced Engineering and Science, 10(1), 49-55.

Moch, E. (2025c). Game theory and the dynamics of entrepreneurial decisions in free markets. East African Journal of Business and Economics, 8(1), 306-327. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajbe.8.1.2877

Moch, E. (2025d). The Matrix as an Economic Network Model: Structures, Incentives and Practical Implications for Platform Economy and Governance. East African Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8(1), 553-562. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajis.8.1.3337

Moch, E. (2025e). Transformation from neoclassicism to Austrian School: Javier Milei's economic evolution. East African Journal of Business and Economics, 8(1), 46-62. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajbe.8.1.2619

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029.

Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Zysman, J., & Kenney, M. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61-69.

Published
8 August, 2025
How to Cite
Moch, E. (2025). Future Orthopia: A Conceptual Design for a Liberal and Robust Market Order in the 21st Century. International Journal of Advanced Research, 8(1), 449-455. https://doi.org/10.37284/ijar.8.1.3461

Most read articles by the same author(s)